Thinking that the VS.Net designer’s inability to deal with generic base classes will disqualify this otherwise sweet approach…
Monthly Archives: October 2009
But unlike shadows, it ONLY hides the method w/ same signature, not all methods w/ same name. #vbnet
But unlike shadows, it ONLY hides the method w/ same signature, not all methods w/ same name. #vbnet
You can overload a method w/ another w/ exact same signature *IF* it’s an inherited method? Effectively shadows original method. #vbnet
You can overload a method w/ another w/ exact same signature *IF* it’s an inherited method? Effectively shadows original method. #vbnet
Hoepfully I’m not too late: @TheWebSqueeze are giving away 2 copies of Balsamiq Mockups! http://tinyurl.com/twsbalsamiq #twsbalsamiq
Hoepfully I’m not too late: @TheWebSqueeze are giving away 2 copies of Balsamiq Mockups! http://tinyurl.com/twsbalsamiq #twsbalsamiq
VS.PHP rocks! I love coding my PHP in the same IDE as my .Net! Everything works as expected regardless of the language! Sweet!
VS.PHP rocks! I love coding my PHP in the same IDE as my .Net! Everything works as expected regardless of the language! Sweet!
Daughter: “Mommy said I have to have treats after supper.” Me: “Yeah, I’m sure she did. Nice try.”
Daughter: “Mommy said I have to have treats after supper.”
Me: “Yeah, I’m sure she did. Nice try.”
Dang! Tweetie 2 is awesome!
Dang! Tweetie 2 is awesome!
I don’t like “utility classes” (classes full of nothing but static methods). Is that wrong?
I don’t like “utility classes” (classes full of nothing but static methods). Is that wrong?
And so begins my first ever attempt at playing golf…
And so begins my first ever attempt at playing golf…
How does an application ensure it’s calling a legitimate web service in an SOA architecture?
How does an application ensure it’s calling a legitimate web service in an SOA architecture?